Woodchipping

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

? This article or section may contain original research or unattributed claims.
Please help Wikipedia by adding references. See the talk page for details.

Woodchipping is an Australian forestry production method of clearcutting, usually resulting in the deforestation of an area. The timber is converted to woodchips and sold, primarily, for paper manufacture. Forestry practices such as short rotation coppice are the usual methods adopted, in most other parts of the world, for the production of woodchips. Woodchipping uses cheap sources of the raw material, such as undeveloped State forests, to become an economical export commodity. In Australia, the Eucalyptus forest is clearfelled - not logged selectively - and regeneration is not possible except with introduced species.[citation needed]

Other uses of wood chips includes the manufacture of particle board (or 'chip board') and other engineered woods, mulch, fuel, and ballast in bulk carrier ships.

Contents

Main article: Forestry

The primary source of wood chips in Australia has been the extensive Eucalyptus hardwood forests found in that country. Prior to the colonisation of Australia, these forests were managed and utilised by the indigenous people. After settlement they were used as a source of timber and firewood or were clearfelled for farming purposes. During the late 1960s and 70s the high demand for paper and the relatively low cost and availability of the native forests made woodchipping a viable proposition for exploitation. The State Parliaments of the day released forrested land and provided infrastructure for the industries.


'Logging' roads are the first stage of the process, the provision of labour and woodchipper mills are the next requirement. The trees are removed from the area via logging trucks and any remaining impedance to further logging is removed or destroyed. The method therefore requires less sophisticated planning and logistics than selective logging and other practices.[citation needed] The woodchips are converted into a fibre which is made into a low grade of paper, usually by the Kraft process, for use as newsprint or toilet paper. Most processing and value adding takes place outside of Australia. [1] The Australian economy benefits directly from a low cost and high volume export commodity. [2]

The environmental impact and effects of processing, such as energy expenditure and chemical waste products, were externalities to the industry. The deforestation of regions also increased salinity problems and erosion.[citation needed] Loss of biodiversity remains an issue to conservation movements. Subsidisation by the governments of the day also insured that the industry was able to continue, creating employment and reinvigorating rural areas in recession[citation needed].

Main article: Paper

Wood chips, as a by-product of the timber industry, have been used in many ways for centuries, for example as a material for the production of wallpaper or as a disposable floor covering in butchers shop or drinking houses.[1] Wood pulp is the primary market for the woodchipping industry in Austalia.

The practice, known as woodchipping, was to make use of the entire plant in the production of wood chips. This was then converted into paper for news print and other low-grade requirements. An energy intensive process, it also involved the use of bleaches and other toxic chemicals. This stage of the process, known as Kraft pulping, was primarily performed in Japan and elsewhere. High demand for paper products saw purpose built bulk carriers increase the export of woodchips from Australia to Japan.

The separation of the chipping stage and the pulping and paper mills required the supply of energy usually sourced from by-products of the process. Additional energy expenditure is found in the shipping of raw materials and export of the finished product.

The large amount of capital investment and the lower number of employees makes this less profitable than other forestry practices.[citation needed] Most forest types did not regenerate after the complete clearfelling of the trees.[citation needed] Replanting of forests was often with a non-endemic tree species and this put further pressure on the surrounding bioregion.[citation needed] An immediate and long term effect on the water tables contributed to the increasing soil salination (salinity) problems of Australia.[citation needed] Logging roads increased the spread of introduced species like the fox (Vulpes vulpes) and Rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus).[citation needed] The effect of these species migration to new areas had an even greater impact than the deforestation itself, significantly reducing biodiversity.[citation needed]

In the late 1970s and 80s, woodchipping of forests was brought into question and became the source of public debate in Australia. Environmental groups addressed, or were formed, to raise awareness. Protest campaigns and direct acts of civil disobedience were also undertaken.


  1. ^ Dept. of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (Last Updated: 19 Jan 2007-01-13). Why Australia needs a Wood and Paper Industry Strategy. DAFF. Retrieved on March 13, 2007. “It will also help cut Australia s bill for imports of wood and paper products. Imports of these products currently exceed our exports by $2 billion a year.”
  2. ^ Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics (ISSN: 1446-0167). Australian Forest and Wood Product Statistics.(March/June quarters 2005) (PDF) 66. abareconomics. Retrieved on March 13, 2007. “1999 - 2003-04 ($m); 'Logs category' Hardwood sawlogs 249.2 250.0 244.1 259.2 249.2: Softwood sawlogs b 404.2 467.1 591.0 608.5 578.3 : Cypress sawlogs 18.7 22.2 22.5 22.9 22.8 : Plywood and veneer logs 34.5 37.9 34.8 44.8 39.2 : Wood panels pulplogs 55.2 56.8 44.7 57.8 51.7  : Export woodchip hardwood pulplogs 300.4 328.2 291.9 349.0 338.0 : Export woodchip softwood pulplogs 62.0 81.8 52.0 50.3 64.8 : Paper pulplogs 106.3 97.4 88.0 120.8 138.3 (emphasis added)”
  • Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics (ISSN: 1446-0167). Australian Forest and Wood Product Statistics.(March/June quarters 2005) (PDF) 50-51. abareconomics. Retrieved on March 13, 2007. “Total woodchips; Quantity 2002-03, 03-04, 04-05- China: 67.6 0.0 69.6 0.0 Japan kt 4 790.0 4 653.7 4 997.3 Other kt 579.5 610.2 531.4 Total kt 5 437.1 5 263.9 5 598.3 (emphasis added)
    Quarters 2004-05 a Pulpwood logs are included in the table exports of roundwood. b Broadleaved woodchip volumes were confidential from February 2000 to May 2000. From 1 June 2000, ABS have applied selected country and state restrictions to broadleaved woodchip exports. From February 2003 all state details are confidential. c Bone dry tonnes. na Not available. Sources: ABS, International Trade, Australia, cat. no. 5465.0, Canberra; ABARE.”
  • The Wilderness Society (2001-01-25). Implications of Selling Native Forests for 9 Cents a Tonne. Home > Campaigns > Forests > Tasmanian Forests. Retrieved on March 14, 2007. “The Wilderness Society has revealed today that Forestry Tasmania is planning to clearfell and woodchip areas of pure rainforest in north-west Tasmania and then convert the cleared areas to plantations.”
  • Open Mind Research Group on behalf of their client Environment Victoria (1994-12-4). Woodchipping to Japan - Joint Environment Group Commissioned Public Opinion. Forest Fact File. Retrieved on March 14, 2007. “Newspoll - December 1994 - To the Question "Next a question about native forests. Do you personally approve or disapprove of trees from Australian's native forests being fell and exported as woodchips to Japan? 80.3% of Australians disapproved, 11.7% approved, 8.0% undecided.”
  • Wilson "Ironbar" Tuckey MP (2000-09-28). Tuckey writes to Tasmania Together committee over woodchipping - Media release. Media Releases The Hon Wilson Tuckey MP Former Minister for Forestry and Conservation. Retrieved on March 14, 2007. “Mr Tuckey was responding to reports in the Launceston Examiner suggesting the phasing out of woodchipping in Tasmania. Press reports in the United States are quoting well known green activists as saying that the US fires, including forest and property destruction, are the result of past forest management policies that prevented harvesting. This has created 'cadaverous' forests overpopulated with sick, dead and skinny trees — the perfect fuel for a wildfire.”
  • Warwick Frost (Published: 1997-03-03). Review of John Dargavel, Fashioning Australia's forests, Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 1995. (htm). The Electronic Journal of Australian and New Zealand History. School of Humanities, James Cook University.. Retrieved on April 4, 2007. “The export of woodchips from Australian native forests over the last few decades has been one of Australia's greatest economic and environmental disasters. Heavily subsidised and poorly managed, wood chipping has continued despite the trend amongst Australia's policy makers towards the rhetoric of economic rationalism. Even though only those with a vested interest could argue for wood chipping on economic grounds, it has managed to gain the strong support of both Labour and Liberal/National Parties. Yet despite these contradictions and the enormous passion the wood chipping debate generates, historians have tended to ignore this issue. John Dargavel's excellent history of Australian forestry goes a long way to filling this gap. Dr Warwick Frost lectures in the School of Economics, La Trobe University.

  • Dargavel, John (1995) Fashioning Australia's forests, Oxford. Oxford University Press.
  • Lines, William J. (1998) A long walk in the Australian bush, Sydney, University of New South Wales Press.
  • Mcdonald, Jan (1975) The Australian woodchip industry : a bibliography Canberra : Subject Reference Section, Parliamentary Library Legislative Service, 1975 "This bibliography has been compiled in connection with the inquiry into the Australian woodchip industry by the Senate Select Committee on Social Environment"
  • Routley, R. and V. (1973) The Fight for the Forests: The Takeover of Australian Forests for Pines, Wood Chips and Intensive Forestry, Research School of Social Sciences, ANU, Canberra.
  • Tamaki, Mitsuzo. (1999) Green business alliance : The case of a Japanese/Australian joint forest plantation project. Asia Pacific journal of economics & business, Dec. 1999, p. 76-96
  • Thompson, Herb and Tracy, Julie.(1995) Woodchipping in Western Australia : timber workers vs. conservationists. Perth, W.A. : Murdoch University. ISBN 0869054538. Working paper (Murdoch University. Dept. of Economics) ; no. 135..
  • Walter, Terry (1976) “Some Cost-benefit Aspects of Wood-Chipping in Western Australia”, Economic Activity, 56- 65.
Advanced Search
Included Web Search Engines


Safe Search

close

Top Matching Results

Occasionally Search.com will highlight specialized results that are based on the context of your query. Examples of specialized results include specific links to news, images, or video.

Top Matching Results may highlight information from other Search.com pages, content from the CNET Network of sites, or third party content. The listings are based purely on relevance. Search.com does not receive payment for listings in this section but our partners that provide this data may get paid for listing these products.

Sponsored Links

This section contains paid listings which have been purchased by companies that want to have their sites appear for specific search terms and related content. These listings are administered, sorted and maintained by a third party and are not endorsed by Search.com.

Search Results

Search.com sends your search query to several search engines at one time and integrates the results into one list which has been sorted by relevance using Search.com's proprietary algorithm. You can customize the list of search engines included in your metasearch from the preferences.

The search engines that are used in your metasearch may allow companies to pay to have their Web sites included within the results. To view the Paid Inclusion policy for a specific search engine, please visit their Web site. Search.com does not accept payment or share revenue with any search engine partner for listings in this section.