From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Steve Sailer (born December 4, 1958) is a reporter, movie critic for The American Conservative, ex-correspondent for UPI, and VDARE.com columnist. He writes about politics, immigration, IQ, genetics, race, gender, movies, and sports.

Sailer was described as an "evolutionary conservative" along with Charles Murray and John McGinnis in a 1999 National Review cover story by John O'Sullivan, referring to his writing dealing with the science of human nature.^[1] Sailer argues that there is a lack of open and fact-based debate regarding intelligence, genetics, race, and gender.^{[2] [3]} He also promotes a political theory called "citizenism," which posits that national identity should take priority over race.

In 1999 Sailer created the Human Biodiversity Institute, an "educational and scientific not-for-profit", which runs a non-public discussion group for "a mix of experts from across the scientific, intellectual, and political spectrums." The HBI webpage argues that understanding the social effects of varying allele distribution will be important if technology in genetics and reproductive therapy progresses to be able to act on allele distribution.^[4] The institute describes existing biodiversity as a valuable "storehouse of data available to base predictions upon," and argues that this area of scientific inquiry is presently discouraged. Sailer plans to expand the institute's activities to include a scientific journal, a webzine, and conferences.

Contents 1 General standpoints 1.1 Evolution 1.2 Race 1.3 Citizenism 1.4 Immigration 1.5 Hurricane Katrina and racial demographics data 2 Controversy 3 Selected bibliography 3.1 Prominent articles 3.1.1 Articles on the red state-blue state divide 3.2 Other articles 4 Quotes 5 References 6 External links

Sailer has described his starting point in analyzing political policies as being concerned with the greatest good for U.S. citizens, as opposed to being concerned with the greatest good for one's "identity group." He refers to this as a "citizenist" stance.^[5]

Sailer writes about racial issues in terms of the 'breeding population' definition used by biologists and evolutionary scientists, arguing: "A race is simply an extremely extended family that inbreeds to some degree [whereas] a species [...] inbreeds virtually exclusively."^[6][7]

Sailer, who calls himself a neo-Darwinist instead of a paleoconservative, calls creationism an “easily falsified theory” that “makes religion in general look stupid,” saying that “Darwinian science is corroborating and extending much of the conservative worldview.”^[8] His argument are paraphrased by John O'Sullivan who says that:

First, that lessons of the new science of evolutionary psychology are largely conservative ones about an adamantine human nature, the natural basis of sex roles, and so on; second, that the knowledge gained from the Human Genome Project and the rise of genetic engineering will throw up some fascinating and contentious political issues in the increasingly near future.^[9]

On the relationship between evolution and religion, Sailer writes:

At minimum, we now know that our natural world cannot account for its own existence. To do that, we need to assume the existence of some sort of supernatural word. And even if some enormous breakthrough let us validate the existence of this superuniverse, we'd probably end up having to assume that it was brought about by some sort of hyperuniverse beyond that, and on and on.^[10]

He also endorsed Jerry Pournelle’s reflection on the subject:

I do object to calling Intelligent Design "science." As I have said, it is explicitly a statement that "science" is not sufficient for understanding the world. I think that lesson in humility would be no bad thing for inclusion in our schools. We will continue to have people who are certain that the application of science is all that is needed to produce good citizens and understand the universe, but I certainly see no harm in letting everyone know that is not the universal view of the world. Science is important, and the key to power and much understanding; it may be everything; but perhaps it is not everything.^[11]

Sailer argues that race is not a social construct. He also specifically asserts that IQ is not only “strongly hereditary,” but that there is a “15 point gap between white and African-American average IQs.”^[12] He defines race thus:

[Race] is essentially a lineage. A racial group is merely an extremely extended family that inbreeds to some extent. Thus, race is a fundamental aspect of the human condition because we are all born into families. Burying our heads in the sand and refusing to think clearly about this bedrock fact of life only makes the inevitable problems caused by race harder to overcome.^[13]

Steve Sailer subscribes to a political theory called "citizenism," which says that national identity should take priority over race.^[14] He says that "Americans should be biased in favor of the welfare of our current fellow citizens over that of the six billion foreigners." He argues that white people are too idealistic and self-sacrificing for "explicit white ethnocentrism" to succeed."^[15]

Sailer opposes "unskilled" immigration, especially from Mexico. His argument against immigration is not based on racism against Mexicans, though he considers their cultural achievements to be inferior.^[16] He instead argues that a Mexican oligarchy knowingly exports illegal immigrants into the U.S. in order to extend its sphere of influence into the country. He often refers to those in power in Latin America as "Latin America's corrupt white elites", mainly because caste in Latin America roughly follows skin color, with the lightest-skinned being at the top of the social and economic structure.

Following Hurricane Katrina, Sailer argues in a series of VDARE articles that subsequent anarchy was preventable and easily foreseen based on "the demographics and culture of New Orleans."^[17] "Officials should have expected that the population that failed to evacuate would be numerous, improvident, poor in judgment, laced with criminals, and highly dangerous to each other." Sailer argues that the racial demographics data would have been germane, as the lower average IQ of the African American population found in intelligence research correlates with "poorer native judgment than members of better-educated groups [resulting in the need for] stricter moral guidance from society."^[18] Realistic predictions of population effects, Sailer argues, were not made because of a cultural taboo against noting negative behavior on the part of poor African Americans.^[19]

Sailer responded to criticism by arguing that many of those making the accusations acknowledged a correlation between low IQ and poor judgment by supporting the U.S. Supreme Court's 2002 Atkins v. Virginia decision "that, in effect, banned the death penalty for killers with IQs under 70."^[20] John Derbyshire defended Sailer in the National Review Online by citing large variance in crime rates by race and birth rates for unmarried women by race.^{[citation needed]} According to Peter Brimelow, Sailer's original article has been emailed out by readers (through the link to "email [this article] to a friend") at among the highest volumes seen by VDARE's articles.^[21]

Sailer's work has been characterized by critics as fringe racism.^[22] The Southern Poverty Law Center, a civil-rights advocacy group, argues the science of human nature that Sailer and the HBI deal with have negative effects for minority population segments, and imply such study isn't scientifically legitimate.^[23] VDARE has been controversial for its immigration reduction stance. Sailer argues the accusation of racism is not a factual or logical refutation of his arguments, but is instead an emotive response to the transgression of taboo

"As when television news broadcasts hours of blacks behaving badly, enormous pressure builds up amongst the commentariat to denounce furiously the first person who is so crass as to mention what everybody can see with their lying eyes. Almost all these condemnations of me have been of the now-traditional point-and-sputter ilk. The critic can't think of any facts or logic to disprove my argument. So he merely gesticulates about what an awful person I must be to say such a horrible thing^[24] ...to gesticulate in fury at the sheer unmentionability of what I've said."^[25]

Sailer notes that the SPLC has been accused by a Pulitzer Prize-finalist investigative report and by a Harper's Magazine exposé of exaggerating the threat of racism for fundraising purposes, and failing to appropriately spend the funds it did raise.^[26]

Sailer's article on Hurricane Katrina was followed by accusations of racism, with the highest profile critic being John Podhoretz, who posted a response on the National Review Online blog.^[27]

The left-leaning media watchdog group Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR) published a report that criticized New York Times columnist David Brooks for citing Sailer's demographic analysis of the 2004 election while failing to acknowledge Sailer as "a leading promoter of racist pseudoscience".^[28] Similarly, Media Matters for America took NBC to task for citing Sailer as a conservative movie critic while omitting any mention of his racial and political beliefs.^[29]

• "Cousin Marriage Conundrum: The ancient practice discourages democratic nation-building," ^[30]
• "The Genetic Revolution," "America's role in the twenty-first century may depend on acknowledging and understanding human genetic diversity." ^[31]
• "Is Love Colorblind?", ^[32] "While interracial marriage is increasingly accepted by whites, a surprising number of Asian men and black women are bitterly opposed. Why?" and its follow-up article "2000 Census Shows Interracial Marriage Gender Gaps Remain Large"^[33]
• "Does Abortion Prevent Crime?", Slate, Aug. 1999. Dialogue between Sailer and University of Chicago economist Steven Levitt on Levitt's legalized abortion and crime effect.
• "How Jackie Robinson Desegregated America", ^[34] "Perhaps the least-learned lesson of the saga of Jackie Robinson is that competition can transform self-interest into an engine for racial fairness."
• Americans First, by Steve Sailer, ^[35] Posits his theory, called "citizenism," that national identity should take priority over race.

After the 2004 U.S. presidential election, Sailer published a series of articles with his analysis of the red state-blue state divide in American politics.

• ""Affordable Family Formation"—The Neglected Key To GOP's Future,"^[36]
• "The Dirt Gap: The Fundamental Cause of Red vs. Blue States,"^[37]
• "The GOP’s Third Electoral Secret: Marriage, Fertility…And Cheap Housing,"^[38]
• "Democrats Recoil From GOP’s Electoral Secret: Marriage Plus Children,"^[39]
• "Baby Gap: How Birthrates Color the Electoral Map,"^[40]

• "Fragmented Future",^[41]
• "What's Wrong With the Democrats?",^[42]
• "Hollywood's Skin Deep Leftism",^[43]
• "We're Different. Get Over It.",^[44]
• "Whites, not Latinos, won it for GOP", ^[45]
• "Revolutionary Nepotism,"^[46] "Nepotism and dynasticism are on the rebound in politics, both abroad and at home. " Review of Adam Bellow's In Praise of Nepotism: A Natural History.
• "How will Annika Sorenstam perform?" ^[47] Sailer analyzed the recent performances of Annika Sörenstam on the LPGA Tour leading up to her 2003 appearance in The Colonial, a tournament on the men's PGA Tour. Sailer predicted that she would most likely miss the cut by four strokes, which she did.
• "Q&A: Steven Pinker of 'Blank Slate'", ^[48]
• A Miracle Happens Here: Darwin's Enemies on the Right, ^[49]
• The Coming War Over Genes: Darwin's Enemies on the Left, ^[50]
  • The Left Doesn’t Like Darwin Either, ^[51]

• "The typical white intellectual considers himself superior to ordinary white people for two contradictory reasons: a] he constantly proclaims belief in human equality, but they don't; b] he has a high IQ, but they don't."^[52]

• "Darwin seems to lose out with the public primarily when his supporters force him into a mano-a-mano Thunderdome death match against the Almighty. Most people seem willing to accept Darwinism as long as they don't have to believe in nothing but Darwinism. Thus, the strident tub-thumping for absolute atheism by evolutionary biologists like Richard Dawkins, whom the new issue of Discover Magazine rightly criticizes as "Darwin's Rottweiler," is self-defeating."^[53]

• "What you won't hear, except from me, is that 'Let the good times roll' is an especially risky message for African-Americans. The plain fact is that they tend to possess poorer native judgment than members of better-educated groups. Thus they need stricter moral guidance from society. ... In contrast to New Orleans, there was only minimal looting after the horrendous 1995 earthquake in Kobe, Japan — because, when you get down to it, Japanese aren't blacks." ^[54]

• "Lenin, Stalin, and Mao slaughtered even more tens of millions in the name of equality than Hitler murdered in the name of inequality." ^[55]

1. ^ Types of Right - National Review
2. ^ See, for example, "More on the New Orleans Nightmare:Why We Have to Talk About Racial Reality Even if John Podhoretz Says We Can’t," VDARE, Sept. 2005.
3. ^ O'Sullivan referred to "evolutionary psychology," but Sailer's summary uses "science of human nature." See: http://isteve.blogspot.com/2002/02/thats-steve-sailer-evolcon-not-evilcon.html.
4. ^ Human Biodiversity Institute
5. ^ December 2002 - isteve.com
6. ^ Darwin's Enemies on the Left, Steve Sailor
7. ^ Making Sense of the Concept of Race: A Race Is An Extremely Extended Family by Steve Sailor
8. ^ Sociobiology at Age 25 by Steve Sailor, National Review, 6/19/2000
9. ^ Types of Right: How the conservatives break down by John O'Sullivan, National Review, 10/11/99
10. ^ Darwin's Enemies on the Right, Steve Sailer, National Post, 11/20/99]
11. ^ Isteve.com: Jerry Pournelle on Intelligent Design
12. ^ The Freakonomics of Race and IQ - Steve Sailer, VDARE
13. ^ The Reality of Race, by Steve Sailer, VDARE, 5/25/2000
14. ^ Americans First, by Steve Sailer, American Conservative, February 13, 2006.
15. ^ Sailer vs. Taylor, Round II —"Citizenism" vs. White Nationalism, Steve Sailer, VDARE, October 08, 2005
16. ^ Latin American Immigration Unlikely to Spark A New Renaissance, Steve Sailer, VDARE, July 25, 2004
17. ^ More On The New Orleans Nightmare: Why We Have To Talk About Racial Reality Even If John Podhoretz Says We Can’t, Steve Sailer, VDARE, September 11, 2005
18. ^ Racial Reality And The New Orleans Nightmare, by Steve Sailer, VDARE, September 3, 2005
19. ^ More On The New Orleans Nightmare: Why We Have To Talk About Racial Reality Even If John Podhoretz Says We Can’t, Steve Sailer, VDARE, September 11, 2005
20. ^ The Supreme Court on IQ and Judgment, Steve Sailer, September 6, 2005
21. ^ Sailer vs. JPod on NO Nightmare, Peter Brimelow, VDARE, 5th September 2005
22. ^ See, for example, "The Most Disgusting Sentence Yet Written About Katrina...", John Podhoretz, National Review Online, Sept. 2005, and "The evilcon revisited", Tacitus (blog), Sept. 2005.
23. ^ Queer Science, By Heidi Beirich and Bob Moser, SPLC
24. ^ More On The New Orleans Nightmare: Why We Have To Talk About Racial Reality Even If John Podhoretz Says We Can’t, Steve Sailer, VDARE, September 11, 2005
25. ^ It's Stevegoating Time!, Steve Sailer, September 6, 2005
26. ^ Scam Watch, Steve Sailer, December 2004
27. ^ The Most Disgusting Sentence Yet Written About Katrina, John Podhoretz, National Review group blog, September 5, 2005
28. ^ Academic Racists Make Mainstream Inroads, Steve Rendall, FAIR, March/April 2005
29. ^ NBC offered far-right columnist Steve Sailer a platform to attack Hollywood, Media Matters for America, Jan 23, 2006
30. ^ The American Conservative, Jan. 2003. Selected for inclusion in Steven Pinker's book The Best American Science and Nature Writing 2004.
31. ^ Speech delivered to Margaret Thatcher and other guests at the Hudson Institutes’ 1999 Thatcher Weekend conference on 'Will the 21st Century Be the American Century?'" Published in American Outlook Magazine, Spring, 2000. (Slideshow)
32. ^ National Review (feature article), July 1997.
33. ^ March 2003
34. ^ National Review (cover story), April 1996 .
35. ^ The American Conservative, February 13, 2006.
36. ^ VDARE.com, May 8, 2005.
37. ^ The American Conservative, Feb. 14, 2005.
38. ^ VDARE.com, Dec. 19, 2004.
39. ^ VDARE.com, Dec. 12, 2004.
40. ^ The American Conservative, Dec. 20, 2004.
41. ^ The American Conservative (cover story), January 15, 2007.
42. ^ The American Conservative (cover story), July 31, 2006.
43. ^ The American Conservative (cover story), June 11, 2005.
44. ^ National Post, Feb. 2005. On the controversy surrounding Larry Summers' statements on the gender gap in the sciences.
45. ^ Washington Times, April 2004.
46. ^ The National Interest, Winter 2003.
47. ^ United Press International, May 13, 2003.
48. ^ United Press International, 2002.
49. ^ National Post, Nov. 20, 1999.
50. ^ National Post, Dec. 1, 1999.
51. ^ Vdare, Aug. 2005.
52. ^ How to Help the Left Half of the Bell Curve by Steve Sailer, VDARE.com, July to September 2000
53. ^ The Left Doesn’t Like Darwin Either, by Steve Sailer, VDARE, August 7, 2005
54. ^ Racial Reality And The New Orleans Nightmare, by Steve Sailer, September 3, 2005]
55. ^ The Coming War over Genes: Darwin's Enemies on the Left, by Steve Sailer, National Post, 12/1/99

• Steve Sailer's website and blog
• The Human Biodiversity Institute via Internet Archives (version of February 10, 2006)
• Steve Sailer's Vdare.com page