Mercury Mountaineer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Mercury Mountaineer
Facelifted 2nd-gen Mercury Mountaineer
Manufacturer Ford Motor Company
Production 1997-present
Assembly Louisville, Kentucky
St. Louis, Missouri
Class Mid-size luxury SUV
Body style 4-door SUV
Similar Buick Rainier
Chrysler Aspen
First generation
1997 Mercury Mountaineer
Production 1997-2001
Engine 4.0 L Cologne V6
5.0 L V8
Transmission 4-speed automatic
5-speed automatic
Wheelbase 111.6 in
Length 190.1 in
Width 70.2 in
Height 70.5 in
Related Ford Explorer
Ford Ranger
Mazda B-Series
Facelifted 1st-gen Mountaineer
Facelifted 1st-gen Mountaineer
Second generation
Pre-facelift 2nd-gen Mercury Mountaineer
Production 2002-2005
Engine 4.0 L Cologne V6
4.6 L Modular V8
Transmission 5-speed automatic
Wheelbase 113.7 in
Length 190.7 in
Width 72.1 in
Height 69.6 in
Related Ford Explorer
Lincoln Aviator
Third generation
3rd-gen Mercury Mountaineer
Production 2006–present
Engine 4.0 L Cologne V6
4.6 L Modular V8
Transmission 6-speed 6R automatic
Wheelbase 113.7 in
Length 193.5 in
Width 73.5 in
Height 72.8 in
Related Ford Explorer

The Mercury Mountaineer is a luxury SUV manufauctured by the Mercury brand name, owned by the Ford Motor Company. The Mountaineer shares many features with the Ford Explorer, and in terms of hardware, the vehicles are virtually identical.[1] Externally, they are styled somewhat differently, and the Mountainer is positioned with a more upscale interior, with the Mountaineer's MSRP coming in at $1,000–6,000 more than the Explorer.[2] It was mildly redesigned for the 2006 model year due to a new frame, but looks very similar to its previous model.

Contents

Although the redesigned Explorer had already been out for 2 years, Mercury introduced an Explorer twin called the Mountaineer. The Mountaineer was only slightly different from the Explorer, although it did offer a few extra luxury features that the Explorer lacked, such as a standard 5.0 L 210 hp Windsor V8. First year sales for the Mountaineer did not meet Mercury's expectations. For 1998, so customers could differentiate the Mountaineer from the Explorer, the front fascia was flipped upside down, and the headlights were made smaller, while it got a new rear hatch and unique wheels. The new overhead-cam 4.0 L 205 hp Cologne V6 with a 5-speed 5R55E automatic was now the standard powerplant. Mountaineer sales sped up because of this, though they still lagged behind the Explorer.

In 2000, a huge punch came to the Mountaineer with the Firestone vs Ford Motor Company controversy, where a large amount of rollovers were happening involving Explorers and Mountaineers. While Ford blamed Firetone's faunty tires, which had problems with the tread separating, Firestone blamed Ford, claiming that the Explorer and Mountaineer were unsafe. The case was settled, and Car and Driver proved that a large amounts of the rollovers were caused by the drivers overracting to the tire blow out.

For 2002, Ford redesigned the Explorer and Mountaineer. This Mountaineer was new from the ground up, offering even more luxury features than the last generation. This Mountaineer offered features like woodgrain trim, rear radio deck, and a rear-seat TV/DVD player. Sales sped up drastically with the introduction of this generation, and it was a look ahead at the entire revamp of the Mercury line, to offer more luxurious looks and features. Some design cues found on this Mountaineer, like the waterfall grille and barred taillights, would go on to form Mercury's new signature look, which would appear on all its models.

For 2006, the Mountaineer was heavily refreshed. The Mountaineer was mounted on a heavily revised frame, and it offered a more upscale interior, to make up for the cut Lincoln Aviator. This Mountaineer got new wheels and HID headlights, a feature not found on previous Mountaineers.

In May 2000, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) contacted Ford and Firestone about the high incidence of tire failure on Mercury Mountaineers, Ford Explorers, and Mazda Navajos fitted with Firestone tires. Ford investigated and found that several models of 15 in (381 mm) Firestone tires (ATX, ATX II, and Wilderness AT) had very high failure rates, especially those made at Firestone's Decatur, Illinois plant.

The failures all involved tread separation—the tread peeling off followed often by tire disintegration. If that happened, and the vehicle was running at speed, there was a high likelihood of the vehicle leaving the road and rolling over. Many rollovers cause serious injury and even death; it has been estimated that over 250 deaths and more than 3,000 serious injuries resulted from these failures.

Ford and Firestone have both blamed the other for the failures, which has led to the severing of relations between the two companies. Firestone has claimed that they have found no faults in design nor manufacture, and that failures have been caused by Ford's recommended tire pressure being too low and the vehicle's design. Ford, meanwhile, pointed out that tires manufactured by the Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company to the same specification had a spotless safety record when installed on the SUVs. Ford's conclusions were confirmed by NHTSA in their report into the tire failures, published in October 2001.

Many outside observers tend towards blaming both parties; Firestone's tires being prone to tread separation and failure, and the vehicles being especially prone to rolling over if a tire fails at speed compared to other vehicles. However, a subsequent NHTSA investigation of real world accident data showed that the SUVs were no more likely to roll over than any other SUV.

A product recall was announced, allowing Explorer, Mountaineer, and Navajo owners to change the affected tires for others.

A large number of lawsuits have been filed against both Ford and Firestone, some unsuccessful, some settled out of court, and a few successfully. Lawyers for the plaintiffs have argued that both Ford and Firestone knew of the dangers but did nothing, and that specifically Ford knew that the Explorer was highly prone to rollovers. Ford denied these allegations.

Car and Driver magazine tested a first-generation Explorer with a built-in rollcage and a special device that would flatten the tire at the push of a button. The Explorer did not flip in any of the numerous tests, and that was mostly because the driver managed to stay calm. Everyday Explorer drivers taken by surprise by a tread separation or loss of tire pressure in high speed traffic situations may have panicked and swerved violently, resulting in a significant portion of reported rollovers.

The Mountaineer was never sold in Canada. The Mountaineer's twin, the Ford Explorer, remains to be sold for the Canadian market. Its other twin, the Lincoln Aviator, was also sold for the Canadian market until its demise in 2005.

  1. ^ Edmunds, 2006 Mountaineer review
  2. ^ Forbes, 2000 Mountaineer review



Mercury | Category | Vehicles |  v  d  e 

Current models:
Grand Marquis | Mariner | Milan | Mountaineer | Sable

Historic models:
Bobcat | Brougham | Capri | Colony Park | Comet | Commuter | Custom | Cougar | Cyclone | Eight | LN7 | Lynx | M-Series | Marauder | Marquis | Medalist | Meteor | Monarch | Montclair | Montego | Monterey | Mystique | Park Lane Brougham | S-55 | Topaz | Tracer | Turnpike Cruiser | Villager | Voyager | Zephyr

Concept cars:
Messenger | Meta One | My


Mercury road vehicle timeline, 1980s-present  v  d  e 
Type 1980s 1990s 2000s
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Subcompact Bobcat Lynx Tracer
Compact Zephyr Topaz Mystique
Mid-size Cougar Marquis Sable Milan
Full-size Marquis Grand Marquis
Colony Park Marauder Montego Sable
Sports car Cougar Cougar
Crossover SUV Mariner
SUV Mountaineer
Minivan Villager Monterey
Advanced Search
Included Web Search Engines


Safe Search

close

Top Matching Results

Occasionally Search.com will highlight specialized results that are based on the context of your query. Examples of specialized results include specific links to news, images, or video.

Top Matching Results may highlight information from other Search.com pages, content from the CNET Network of sites, or third party content. The listings are based purely on relevance. Search.com does not receive payment for listings in this section but our partners that provide this data may get paid for listing these products.

Sponsored Links

This section contains paid listings which have been purchased by companies that want to have their sites appear for specific search terms and related content. These listings are administered, sorted and maintained by a third party and are not endorsed by Search.com.

Search Results

Search.com sends your search query to several search engines at one time and integrates the results into one list which has been sorted by relevance using Search.com's proprietary algorithm. You can customize the list of search engines included in your metasearch from the preferences.

The search engines that are used in your metasearch may allow companies to pay to have their Web sites included within the results. To view the Paid Inclusion policy for a specific search engine, please visit their Web site. Search.com does not accept payment or share revenue with any search engine partner for listings in this section.