List of cases involving Lord Denning

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Chronological list of cases in which Lord Denning sat as a judge. In most cases he played a decisive role in the final outcome and in many changed the law in a major way.


  • Central London Property Trust Ltd v. High Trees House Ltd [1947] K.B. 130 — Denning resurrects the lost doctrine of Promissory Estoppel.
  • Solle v. Butcher [1950] 1 K.B. 671
  • Errington v. Errington (1951) K.B.C.A. — Denning creates the equitable doctrine of "part performance" to save an incomplete contract.
  • Combe v. Combe (1952) Eng. K.B. — Denning elaborates his stance on Promissory Estoppel; calls it a "shield", not a "sword".
  • Drive-Yourself-Hire v. Strutt, [1953] 2 All E.R. 1475.
  • Entores Ltd. v. Miles Far East Corp. (1955) 2 ALL ER 493 — Decides that the "moment of acceptance" in a contract using a telex (electronic communication) happens on the receiver's side.
  • Ward v. Bynham (1956) Eng.C.A.
  • Hornal v. Neuberger [1956] Eng.C.A.
  • Ward v James [1965] Eng.C.A.
  • D & C Builders Ltd. v. Rees (1965) Eng.C.A. — To resolve a debt there must be "accord and satisfaction" where the agreement cannot be made under duress.
  • Beswick v. Beswick (1966), Eng.C.A., [1968] A.C. 58 — Denning allows a poor widow to reclaim the assets of her late husband when it was taken from her husband's nephew.
  • E.R. Ives Investments Ltd. v. High [1967] 2 QB 379
  • Gallie v. Lee (1969), Eng.C.A.
  • Gould v. Gould (1970) 1 Q.B. 275 — Denning dissented to the idea that a husband's promise to help out his wife "as long as [he is] able" should be enforceable.
  • Hinz v. Berry (1970), [1970] 1 All E.R. 1074 (C.A.)
  • Lewis v. Averay (1971), Eng.C.A. — The purchaser of stolen goods should not bear the costs of re-embursing the victim of theft.
  • W.J. Allan & Co. v. El Nasr Export & Import Co [1972] 2 Q.B. 189
  • Fuller v. Fuller [1973] 1 WLR 730 — Changed divorce law. Married couples are only cohabiting if they are living with each other as husband and wife.
  • Lloyds Bank Ltd. v. Bundy (1975) Q.B.
  • Courtney and Fairbairn Ltd. v. Tolaini Brothers (Hotels) Ltd. [1975] 1 All E.R. 716 — A contract cannot have terms that are to be negotiated on at a later point.
  • British Crane Hire Corporation Ltd. v. Ipswich Plant Hire Ltd. [1975] Q.B. 303
  • Anton Piller v. Manufacturing Processes [1976] C.A.
  • Miller v. Jackson (1977) Q.B. 966 - The 'Cricket' case.
  • Esso Petroleum Co. Ltd. v. Mardon [1976] Q.B. 801 (C.A.) — Denning decides to turn representations made by parties with expert knowledge and experience into warranties of the contract.
  • Butler Machine Tool Co. Ltd. v. Ex-Cell-o Corp. Ltd. [1979] 1 All. E.R. (C.A.)
  • Brikom Investments v. Carr [1979]
  • Photo Productions v. Securicor Ltd. [1980] All E.R. 556
Advanced Search
Included Web Search Engines


Safe Search

close

Top Matching Results

Occasionally Search.com will highlight specialized results that are based on the context of your query. Examples of specialized results include specific links to news, images, or video.

Top Matching Results may highlight information from other Search.com pages, content from the CNET Network of sites, or third party content. The listings are based purely on relevance. Search.com does not receive payment for listings in this section but our partners that provide this data may get paid for listing these products.

Sponsored Links

This section contains paid listings which have been purchased by companies that want to have their sites appear for specific search terms and related content. These listings are administered, sorted and maintained by a third party and are not endorsed by Search.com.

Search Results

Search.com sends your search query to several search engines at one time and integrates the results into one list which has been sorted by relevance using Search.com's proprietary algorithm. You can customize the list of search engines included in your metasearch from the preferences.

The search engines that are used in your metasearch may allow companies to pay to have their Web sites included within the results. To view the Paid Inclusion policy for a specific search engine, please visit their Web site. Search.com does not accept payment or share revenue with any search engine partner for listings in this section.