Good Old Cause

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Good Old Cause was the name given by the soldiers of the New Model Army for the reasons they fought for the Parliament of England against King Charles I and the Royalists during the English Civil War and the support they gave to the English Commonwealth between 1649 and 1660. Many of those who supported the Good Old Cause were also Independents who advocated local congregational control of religious and church matters.

Those who disagreed with expedient political compromises made during the Interregnum, went back to the Army's own declarations during the wars, to republican pamphlets like those produced by John Lilburne, Marchamont Needham and John Milton. In the disappointment of the moment, they imagined that there had been a moment of revolutionary purity when all these writers had agreed on something intrinsically republican and good — this entity, shifting as the sands depending upon the writer, was often labelled the good old cause and became, in the hands of radicals in the 18th and 19th centuries, one of the main supports to agitation within England by linking their cause to the cause of the English Civil War radicals. This memory was sustained by the publication of various tracts about the civil war across the 18th Century — Edmund Ludlow's "Memoirs" in 1701 by John Toland for instance that sought to radicalise the memory of the English Civil War.[1]

Important work on the republican imagination includes Jonathan Scott on Algernon Sydney and seventeenth-century republicanism, Nigel Smith on the radical John Streater, and Blair Worden on the memory of the Civil Wars.[2][3][4]

  1. ^ Barbour References in the section "K. Edmund Ludlow (c. 1617–1692)", cites A. B. Worden's edition, A Voyce from the Watch Tower: Part Five: 1660–1662 (1978) and writes "Worden elaborates on 'two claims made in 1978': 'that the reviser of the manuscript is likely to have been the deist and republican John Toland; and that the Memoirs were prepared, and need to be read, with an eye to the political circumstances of the later sixteen-nineties.' "
  2. ^ Barbour References in the section "H. Algernon Sidney (1622–1683)", cites Jonathan Scott Algernon Sidney and the English Republic, 1623–1677 (1988), and writes "Scott shows that 'Sidney not only produced a powerful and influential revolution ideology, but did so with insights which mark a crucial development between the sixteenth-century skepticism of Machiavelli, and the eighteenth-century idea of progress.' "
  3. ^ Barbour References in the section "T. John Streater (fl. 1642–1687)", cites Nigel Smith, Literature and Revolution in England, 1640–1660 (1994) and wrties "Smith ... defines Streater's pamphleteering critique of Cromwellian autocracy as 'an example of an indigenous classical republicanism.' "
  4. ^ Barbour References in the section "B. Critical Studies", mentions several works which Blair Worden contributed to. In other sections Barbour notes that Wotton has written about Algernon Sidney (in The Commonwealth Kidney of Algernon Sidney, JBS 24 (1985), 1–40) and about Edmund Ludlow (in Whig History and Puritan Politics: The Memoirs of Edmund Ludlow Revisited, Historical Research 75 (2002), 209–37).


Advanced Search
Included Web Search Engines


Safe Search

close

Top Matching Results

Occasionally Search.com will highlight specialized results that are based on the context of your query. Examples of specialized results include specific links to news, images, or video.

Top Matching Results may highlight information from other Search.com pages, content from the CNET Network of sites, or third party content. The listings are based purely on relevance. Search.com does not receive payment for listings in this section but our partners that provide this data may get paid for listing these products.

Sponsored Links

This section contains paid listings which have been purchased by companies that want to have their sites appear for specific search terms and related content. These listings are administered, sorted and maintained by a third party and are not endorsed by Search.com.

Search Results

Search.com sends your search query to several search engines at one time and integrates the results into one list which has been sorted by relevance using Search.com's proprietary algorithm. You can customize the list of search engines included in your metasearch from the preferences.

The search engines that are used in your metasearch may allow companies to pay to have their Web sites included within the results. To view the Paid Inclusion policy for a specific search engine, please visit their Web site. Search.com does not accept payment or share revenue with any search engine partner for listings in this section.