Entertainment Software Rating Board
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Entertainment Software Rating Board (ESRB) is a self-regulatory organization that applies and enforces ratings, advertising guidelines, and online privacy principles for computer and video games and other entertainment software in North America ( Quebec in 2004 and 2005).[citations needed]
It was established in 1994 by the Interactive Digital Software Association (now the Entertainment Software Association). By early 2003, it had rated over 8,000 titles submitted by 350 publishers.[citations needed]
The decision to found the ESRB was influenced by violent content found in games such as Mortal Kombat and Night Trap and other controversial video games depicting violent or sexual situations at the time, and by pressure from the United States Congress.[citations needed]
Contents |
The ESRB applies ratings to games based on their content, similar to the motion picture rating systems used in many countries. Their aim is to aid consumers in determining a game's content and suitability. A game's rating is displayed on its box, the media, in advertisements and on game web sites.
The rating system is voluntary, so companies do not have to submit a game for rating before selling it. However, most game publishers in the United States use the system.
The rating has two parts: rating symbols and content descriptors. The rating symbols are usually found on the lower right or the lower left hand corner on the front of the box; they suggest what age group the game is best suited for. The content descriptors are found on the back of the box, usually in the lower left or right hand corner; they describe particular content elements that may be of interest or concern.
The symbols the ESRB uses are stylized depictions of alphabetical letters meant to convey at a glance a game's suitability.
| EC — Early Childhood: Contains content that is considered suitable for ages 3 and older. Games with this rating contain no material that parents or educators would find inappropriate. Games that fall under this rating are specifically intended for young children and are usually educational in nature. However, some educational games with more complex problems (such as the Dr. Brain series)[1] may be rated E. | |
| E — Everyone: Contains content that is considered unsuitable for children under 6. Titles in this category may contain minimal cartoon, fantasy or mild violence and/or infrequent use of mild language. The most common genres of games with this rating are sports, puzzle, simulation, and simple adventure. | |
| E10+ — Everyone 10+: Contains content that is considered unsuitable for children under 10. Titles in this category may contain more cartoon, fantasy or mild violence, mild language, minimal and/or infrequent blood and/or minimal suggestive themes. The most common genres with this rating are simple bloodless action/adventure, street racing, fighting and role-playing. Added to the ESRB ratings icons on March 2, 2005, Donkey Kong Jungle Beat was the first game to receive this rating. | |
| T — Teen: Contains content that is considered unsuitable for children under 13. Titles in this category may contain violence, suggestive themes, crude humor, minimal blood, simulated gambling, and/or infrequent use of strong language. The most common genres with this rating are role-playing, fighting, first-person shooter, and real-time strategy. | |
| M — Mature: Contains content that is considered unsuitable for children under 17. Titles in this category may contain violence such as blood and gore, sexual references and/or language. Many retailers (such as Target and Wal-Mart in the United States, Future Shop in Canada, and Best Buy in both countries) have a policy of not selling games with this rating to people under the age of 17 without parental presence and approval. The most common genres with this rating are first-person shooter, fighting and adult. | |
| AO — Adults Only: Contains content that may include pornographic video games that depicts sex and/or extreme, uncensored violence that includes blood and gore. As of August 2007, there have been twenty-five products which have received the rating, most of which are available on Windows and Apple Macintosh computers, as well as the Philips CD-i. The AO rating is the subject of an ongoing, heated controversy because of the extreme restrictions it puts on game sales. For example, all three of the major video game console manufacturers (Nintendo, Sony and Microsoft) strictly prohibit the release and sale of AO-rated games on their consoles, while major retailers such as Wal-Mart, Target, Future Shop, Best Buy, and some Circuit City stores do not allow AO-rated games on their shelves. Games from major publishers that receive an AO rating are often 'toned down' in order to gain the lesser rating of Mature such as Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas and Manhunt 2, both of which were released by Rockstar Games. | |
| RP — Rating Pending: Product has been submitted to the ESRB and is awaiting final rating or is still undergoing production and is not ready for review. This symbol appears only in advertising and/or demos prior to a game's release. |
The following rating has been updated and is no longer used, but it may appear on games published previously.
| K-A — Kids to Adults: Contains content that may be suitable for ages 6 and older. These titles will appeal to people of many ages and tastes. They may contain minimal violence, some comic mischief (for example, slapstick comedy), or some crude language. It was replaced by Everyone on January 1, 1998. Examples of games with this rating are Star Fox 64, Crash Bandicoot, Rayman, Super Mario 64, Chrono Trigger, Snowboard Kids, Donkey Kong Country and Lego Island. |
The content descriptors are not exhaustive descriptions of all content within a game: they are applied within the context of the rating a game is assigned. For example, a Teen game with one use of strong language and numerous uses of mild language would receive a "Mild Language" descriptor. They are also not always printed as shown below. They may have additional words added to further clarify the highlighted content such as "Mild Blood" and "Mild Suggestive Themes".
- Alcohol Reference — Reference to and/or images of alcoholic beverages.[2]
- Animated Blood — Discolored and/or unrealistic depictions of blood.[2]
- Blood — Depictions of blood.[2]
- Blood and Gore — Depictions of blood or the mutilation of body parts.[2]
- Cartoon Violence — Violent actions involving cartoon-like or animated situations and characters. May also include violence where a character is unharmed after the action has been inflicted.[2]
- Comic Mischief — Depictions or dialogue involving slapstick or suggestive humor.[2]
- Crude Humor — Depictions or dialogue involving vulgar antics, including "bathroom humor".[2]
- Drug Reference — Reference to and/or images of illegal drugs.[2]
- Fantasy Violence — Violent actions of a fantasy nature, involving human or non-human characters in situations easily distinguishable from real life.[2]
- Intense Violence — Graphic and realistic-looking depictions of physical conflict. May involve extreme and/or realistic blood, gore, weapons, and depictions of human injury and death.[2]
- Language — Mild to moderate use of profanity.[2]
- Lyrics — Mild references to profanity, sexuality, violence, alcohol, or drug use in music.[2]
- Mature Humor — Depictions or dialogue involving "adult" humor, including sexual references.[2]
- Nudity — Graphic or prolonged depictions of nudity.[2]
- Partial Nudity — Brief and/or mild depictions of nudity.[2]
- Real Gambling — Player can gamble, including betting or wagering real cash or currency.[2]
- Sexual Themes — Mild to moderate sexual references and/or depictions. May include partial nudity.[2]
- Sexual Violence — Depictions of rape or other sexual acts such as Chinese nipple torture and prison activities.[2]
- Simulated Gambling — Player can gamble without betting or wagering real cash or currency.[2]
- Strong Language — Explicit and/or frequent use of profanity.[2]
- Strong Lyrics — Explicit and/or frequent references to profanity, sex, violence, alcohol, or drug use in music.[2]
- Strong Sexual Content — Graphic references to and/or depictions of sexual behavior.[2]
- Suggestive Themes — Mild provocative references or materials.[2]
- Tobacco Reference — Reference to and/or images of tobacco products.[2]
- Use of Drugs — The consumption or use of illegal drugs.[2]
- Use of Alcohol — The consumption of alcoholic beverages.[2]
- Use of Tobacco — The consumption of tobacco products.[2]
- Violence — Scenes involving aggression, such as fighting, shooting, and/or killing.[2]
- Violent References — References to violent acts.[2]
Online games that include user-generated content (e.g., chat, maps, skins) carry the notice Game Experience May Change During Online Play to warn consumers that content created by players of the game has not been rated by the ESRB. This is used to describe the fact that players online may speak in inappropriate manners, or use foul language (which cannot be effectively rated by ESRB).[3]
The following content descriptors have been updated and are no longer used, but they may appear on games published prior to their discontinuation. Reissued games that were originally rated when the now-discontinued descriptors were used by the ESRB may still contain such descriptors on their packaging.
- Animated Blood and Gore — Cartoon or pixelated images of blood or the mutilation of body parts.
- Animated Violence — Cartoon or pixelated scenes depicting animated characters in unsafe and/or violent situations.
- Gambling — Betting-like behavior.
- Gaming — Betting-like behavior.
- Mature Sexual Themes — Provocative material, possibly including partial nudity.
- Mild Animated Violence — Mild cartoon or pixelated scenes depicting animated characters in unsafe and/or violent situations.
- Mild Realistic Violence — Mild photographic-like detailed depictions of characters in unsafe and/or violent situations.
- Reading Skills, Fine Motor Skills, Higher-Level Thinking Skills — These phrases are found only on products rated Early Childhood and indicate whether children's reading, computer, or other skills are used in these titles.
- Realistic Blood — Photographic-like detailed depictions of blood.
- Realistic Blood and Gore — Photographic-like detailed depictions of blood or the mutilation of body parts.
- Realistic Violence — Photographic-like detailed depictions of characters in unsafe and/or violent situations.
- See also: MPAA film rating system
To obtain a rating for a game, a publisher sends the ESRB videotaped footage of the game's most graphic and extreme content. The publisher also fills out a questionnaire describing the game's content and encloses a check for between $2,000 and $3,000.[4]
The ESRB states on its website that three trained raters, working independently, then watch the footage and recommend a rating. If all raters agree on the rating, content descriptors are added and the ESRB notifies the publisher of its decision. If there is no consensus, additional raters review the footage and materials. After the rating is agreed upon, the ESRB in-house personnel review the footage and all materials to ensure that all information is accurate and a certificate is sent to the publisher. If the publisher wishes, they may edit the game and resubmit the footage and questionnaire in order to achieve a lower rating. If this is the case, the process begins anew. The publisher may also appeal the game's rating if they wish. The appeals committee is composed of entertainment software industry representatives.
When the game is ready for release, the publisher sends copies of the final version of the game to the ESRB. The game packaging is reviewed, and the ESRB says that its in-house personnel randomly play games to ensure that all the information provided during the rating process was complete and accurate. Penalties may apply to the publisher if it is eventually found, either through the in-house personnel's playing or consumer comments that the game's content is more extreme than the publisher stated in its application.
The identities of the ESRB raters are kept confidential and selected randomly from a pool of full-time ESRB employees who live in the New York City area. According to an ESRB introductory brochure from 1994: "The raters represent a wide range of backgrounds, races, and ages and have no ties to the interactive entertainment industry. Raters include retired school principals, parents, professionals, and other individuals from all walks of life."
As videogaming progressed into the 16-bit era, graphics and sound capabilities were dramatically increased. Blood and gore was much clearer and vibrant than 8-bit games. For example blood in an 8-bit game may look blocky and pixelated while in 16-bit it can be a fluid graphic that can easily be identified. After the release of games such as Mortal Kombat, Doom, Night Trap and Lethal Enforcers (which used the Konami Justifier), there was much controversy over video game content. Congressional hearings on video game violence and the corruption of society, headed by Joe Lieberman and Herb Kohl were held in late 1992 to 1993. The result of the hearings was that the entertainment software industry was given one year to form a workable rating system or the federal government would intervene and create its own system. Around this time, the Videogame Rating Council (VRC) was formed by Sega of America to rate mostly its own games. In 1993, the Interactive Digital Software Association (IDSA) was formed to unite the entertainment software industry. Also in 1993, the 3DO Company formed their own rating system for games released on the 3DO Interactive Multiplayer called the 3DO Rating System. In 1994, the Recreational Software Advisory Council (RSAC) was formed by the Software Publishers Association. However, because of some criticisms of the both the VRC and RSAC, the VRC was phased out in 1994 and RSAC in 1999. On July 29, 1994 the proposal from the IDSA for a rating system, the Entertainment Software Rating Board (ESRB) was presented in Congress and approved. In September 1994, the ESRB was established and became the official rater of video games in the United States. At this time, many companies who produced computer games such as LucasArts, Sierra On-Line and 3D Realms continued to follow the RSAC system as they were members of the SPA. This resulted in video games having ESRB ratings and some computer games having them as well while other computer games had RSAC ratings. Eventually, all companies, including 3DO, agreed to follow the ESRB ratings.
Initially, there were five different ratings: Early Childhood, Kids to Adults, Teen, Mature and Adults Only. Shortly thereafter, the Informational and Edutainment descriptors were added. In 1996, the rating icons were altered so that it would be more clear who rated the product (this can be seen in the image of the Kids to Adults icon above). On January 1, 1998, the Kids to Adults rating was replaced with Everyone. Also in 1998, the Entertainment Software Rating Board Interactive (ESRBi) was formed which rated websites and online games. In late 1999, in order to make the rating symbols more legible, the pixelated rating icons were replaced with black and white icons. Beginning in early 2001, and continuing for the next couple of years, several of the content descriptors were retired and replaced. Content descriptors with "Animated" or "Realistic" in them had those portions removed. Also, the "Skills" descriptors used for the Early Childhood rating were removed as well. A short time later, the Gaming descriptor was changed to Gambling, which itself was split into Real and Simulated Gambling in the following years.
In mid 2003, the ESRBi was closed down. On June 26, 2003, the content descriptors were made larger and more legible and newer, more thorough descriptors for violence (Cartoon, Fantasy, Intense) were added as well as a descriptor for Mature Humor. Also, the Mature and Adults Only icons had a 17+ and 18+ added to their title band in order to clearly signify the age appropriateness. On March 2, 2005, after conferring with academicians and child development experts, the Everyone 10+ rating was introduced.[5] Originally, raters were hired on a part-time basis; as of April 2007, the ESRB employs raters full-time.[6]
The ESRB has often been accused of not rating games harshly enough for violence and other related themes. Games such as Harvester, Manhunt, Rise of the Triad and Soldier of Fortune have shown gruesome violence, yet only got the M rating, which is supposed to be the entertainment software equivalent of the United States' R rating. Many critics have claimed that these games deserve the AO rating[7] and were given the M for commercial reasons.[8] Rise of the Triad in particular, received the highest violence descriptor: "Wanton and gratuitous violence" from the RSAC, which was mitigated by being rated M by the ESRB. However, in the Canadian provinces of British Columbia and Ontario, their respective provincial governments re-rated Soldier of Fortune and Manhunt as Restricted (not to be confused with the aforementioned R rating).[9] The ESRB has only given out the AO rating solely for violence twice: once for The Punisher[10] and the second time for Manhunt 2.[11] However, both games were edited before release in order to qualify for the M category (however the PC version of The Punisher remains uncensored, yet still receives a M rating).[citation needed] Another game, Thrill Kill, received an AO rating with content descriptors for Animated Violence and Animated Blood and Gore. It was never released after the original publisher, Virgin Entertainment, was purchased by Electronic Arts who was more concerned about the adult content.[12] The violence in Thrill Kill was a concern to the ESRB as it was sexualized, with sadomasochistic activities.
Critics have claimed that the ESRB will only rate games AO if they have sexual content in them, regardless of how much violence is present. Twenty-five products have been given the AO rating. One was given it for unsimulated online gambling. The rest were given it for sexual content and/or nudity. One of the games with "Strong Sexual Content" as a content descriptor also had "Realistic Blood & Gore", Riana Rouge, and another one had "Violence", Critical Point. Critical Point is an eroge, and Riana Rouge has Playboy Playmates in softcore sex scenes which leads some critics to believe that these games were rated AO because of sex, not violence. Lula 3D contains descriptors for "Blood", "Strong Language" and "Violence" in addition to sexually explicit material. Fahrenheit: Indigo Prophecy Director's Cut also received the AO rating. While the game contains content identical to the original North American version titled Indigo Prophecy ("Blood", "Strong Language", "Use of Drugs and Alcohol" and "Violence"), the only content which was added in the director's cut version was sex scenes with nudity, one of which was interactive. Much like Fahrenheit, Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas received an AO rating because interactive sex scenes could be accessed in the game. Some critics believed that the ESRB in-house personnel may have overreacted to the attention the game received from the federal government and that the mini-game (which contained no nudity) was not explicit enough to have been re-rated. It should be noted that many adult oriented products, including erotica, have actually received M ratings.[13] However, these products are not carried by major retailers (and many are usually grouped with adult products anyway) because of the sexual content.
In 2005, Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas for Windows was modified by players into allowing one to play an incomplete sex mini-game known as "Hot Coffee" that Rockstar North decided to leave out of the final game. California assemblyperson Leland Yee used the situation to rebuke them both and has cited this as a case of the ESRB not doing its job. U.S. Senators Hillary Rodham Clinton and Joe Lieberman, a video game censorship advocate, joined in on the disapproval. Rockstar initially claimed that the code was actually rewritten and that gamers are altering the games content, not just unlocking the game. However, their stance changed when it came to light that the console versions of San Andreas were also modifiable through the assistance of a third-party cheat device. In light of this, Rockstar conceded that the disputed scene was in the final game on all formats.[14] The ESRB responded to the controversy by re-evaluating San Andreas' Mature rating and changing it to Adults Only. This would make Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas the most popular and best selling game to receive this rating. Rockstar released a patch that disabled modification on PC versions. Rockstar also re-released the game, bearing the title of Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas, Special Edition, which did not include the necessary files for "Hot Coffee" and had the game's original M rating.
In 2006, The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion had its rating changed from Teen to Mature due to "more detailed depictions of blood and gore than were considered in the original rating, as well as the presence of a locked-out art file or 'skin' that, if accessed through a third-party modification to the PC version of the game, allows the user to play with topless versions of female characters."[citation needed] The game's publisher decided to not remaster or rerelease the game to remove the hidden texture, stating that it believed the original rating was the most accurate assessment of what parents should expect from the game, since the texture was intended to be inaccessible to players. However, this texture was actually only used to provide a non-clipping texture for some armor types.
Rockstar Games' Manhunt 2 was postponed for three months in the United States as well as several other countries and continents due to uncensored relentless violence and gore. The game was given an initial AO rating by the ESRB and received a revised M mature rating after numerous edits. It was released October 31, 2007. Less than a week after the release, it was discovered that it was possible to modify the PS2 and PSP versions of the game to erase the patches that censored the violent content. Strangely enough, the ESRB chose not to change the game's rating after the drawn-out process of giving it the M rating. [15][16][17]
- ^ Dr Brains (series) Ratings Dr Brain's Ratings
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac ESRB Ratings Page
- ^ Brief Example - Brief Example
- ^ Vista Not So Beautiful, say Casual Devs on GameDaily BIZ. Accessed on January 18, 2007.
- ^ A majority of the information in this section was obtained from the archived ESRB website, available at Internet Archive.
- ^ "ESRB hiring full-time raters" - GameSpot News, 2007-2-21.
- ^ Snuff games and ratings - CNNMoney.com, November 26, 2003.
- ^ The Ratings Game: The Controversy Over The ESRB - Game Informer magazine, August 2006.
- ^ http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2004/03/04/manhunt040304.html
- ^ "Video game rating board don't get no respect" - Paul Hyman, The Hollywood Reporter, April 8, 2005.
- ^ "Manhunt 2 receives AO rating" - GameSpot News, 2007-06-19.
- ^ "EA kills 'Thrill Kill' game before release", ZDNet, 1998-10-15. Retrieved on 2006-12-18.
- ^ Examples: Babes of Summer Jigsaw Puzzles, Beverly Hills Models, Blue Heat: The Case of the Cover Girl Murders, Club 21, Club Royal - The Exclusive Striptease Club of the Beyond, Cyber Photographer and Printshop, Fantasy Vixens Jigsaw Puzzles, The Girls of Paradise Cove, The Guy Game, Leisure Suit Larry series 1-7, Malibu Models, Playboy Screensaver II, Tabloid Beauties, TV's Lifeguard Babes
- ^ "Hidden sex scenes hit GTA rating", BBC News, 2005-07-21. Retrieved on 2006-12-18.
- ^ ESRB Changes Rating For The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion From Teen to Mature. ESRB (2006-05-03). Retrieved on 2006-12-18.
- ^ Sinclair, Brendan. "Oblivion rerated M for Mature", GameSpot News, 2006-05-03. Retrieved on 2006-12-18.
- ^ "Bethesda responds to Oblivion rerating", GameSpot News, 2006-05-03. Retrieved on 2006-12-18.
- Censorship
- Censorship in the United States
- MPAA film rating system, the U.S. film industry equivalent to ESRB
- PEGI, Pan European Game Information, used in many European countries, not associated with the European Union.
- TV Parental Guidelines
- Australia - Office of Film and Literature Classification (Australia)
- Europe (excluding Germany) - Pan European Game Information
- Finland - Valtion elokuvatarkastamo, Finnish Board of Film Classification
- Germany - Unterhaltungssoftware Selbstkontrolle
- Japan - Computer Entertainment Rating Organization
- New Zealand - Office of Film and Literature Classification (New Zealand)
- United Kingdom - British Board of Film Classification
Categories: All articles with unsourced statements | Articles with unsourced statements since October 2007 | Articles with unsourced statements since June 2007 | Articles with unsourced statements since November 2007 | Video game organizations | Video game content ratings systems | Arts and media trade groups | Video game industry advocacy groups | Entertainment Software Association | Entertainment rating organizations
