Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (or CFIUS) is an inter-agency committee of the United States Government that reviews the national security implications of foreign acquisitions of U.S. companies or operations. Chaired by the Secretary of the Treasury, CFIUS includes representatives from 12 U.S. agencies, including the Defense, State and Commerce departments, as well as (most recently) the Department of Homeland Security.

Companies proposing to be involved in an acquisition by a foreign firm are supposed to voluntarily notify CFIUS, but CFIUS can review transactions that are not voluntarily submitted. CFIUS reviews begin with a 30-day decision to authorize a transaction or begin a statutory investigation. If the latter is chosen, the committee has another 45 days to decide whether to permit the acquisition or order divestment. Most transactions submitted to CFIUS are approved without the statutory investigation.[1]

CFIUS has looked at the "restrictions on sale of advanced computers to any of a long list of foreign recipients, ranging from China to Iran."[2] CFIUS reviews even deals with firms from U.S. allies, such as BAE Systems' early-2005 acquisition of United Defense. This and the vast majority of transactions submitted to CFIUS are approved without difficulty. But at least one deal has been called off when CFIUS began to take a closer look.[3]

Some important cases include:

  • The 2005 acquisition by Lenovo, the largest personal computer company in China, of IBM's personal computer and laptop unit
  • State-owned China National Offshore Oil Corporation's attempted acquisition of UNOCAL (2005)
  • State-owned Dubai Ports World's planned acquisition of P&O, the operator of many US ports, including New York (2006)
  • NTT Communications' acquision of Verio (2000)
  • The 2005 acquisition of Sequioa Voting Systems of Oakland, California, by Smartmatic, a Dutch company contracted by Hugo Chávez's government to replace that country's elections machinery[4]

In February 2006, Richard Perle gave more insight into CFIUS when he related to CBS News his experience on the panel during the Reagan administration, "The committee almost never met, and when it deliberated it was usually at a fairly low bureaucratic level." He also added, "I think it's a bit of a joke if we were serious about scrutinizing foreign ownership and foreign control, particularly since 9/11."[5]

Others emphasize the crucial role that foreign direct investment plays in the U.S. economy, and the discouraging effect that heightened scrutiny and protectionism can cause. Foreign investors in the United States, much like U.S. investors elsewhere, bring expertise and infusions of capital into often-struggling sectors of the U.S. economy. In a February 2006 interview with the New York Times, another former Reagan administration official, Clyde V. Prestowitz Jr., noted that the United States "need[s] a net inflow of capital of $3 billion a day to keep the economy afloat.... Yet all of the body language here is 'go away.'"[6] And, as Secretary Powell once remarked, "money, capital, is a coward; it will go nowhere where it is put in fear."[7]

  1. ^ Sills, Gay Hartwell (2006). Committee on Foreign Investments in the United States (CFIUS). U.S. Department of Treasury, Office of the Assistant Secretary International Affairs, Office of International Investment. Retrieved on 2006-03-26.
  2. ^ Rash, Wayne. "Suppose IBM-Lenovo Deal Doesn't Happen", eWeek.com, January 24, 2005.
  3. ^ McCarthy, Ellen. "Purchase by Israeli Firm Called Off", Washington Post, March 24, 2006, p. A06.
  4. ^ http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/31/us/politics/31vote.html
  5. ^ "Bush, Congress In Dark About Port Deal", CBS News, February 22, 2006.
  6. ^ Porter, Eduardo. "Dubai Deal's Collapse Prompts Fears Abroad on Trade With U.S.", The New York Times, March 10, 2006. (free registration required to access content)
  7. ^ Powell, Colin. "Remarks at Sovereign Credit Rating Conference", United States Department of State, April 23, 2002.
Advanced Search
Included Web Search Engines


Safe Search

close

Top Matching Results

Occasionally Search.com will highlight specialized results that are based on the context of your query. Examples of specialized results include specific links to news, images, or video.

Top Matching Results may highlight information from other Search.com pages, content from the CNET Network of sites, or third party content. The listings are based purely on relevance. Search.com does not receive payment for listings in this section but our partners that provide this data may get paid for listing these products.

Sponsored Links

This section contains paid listings which have been purchased by companies that want to have their sites appear for specific search terms and related content. These listings are administered, sorted and maintained by a third party and are not endorsed by Search.com.

Search Results

Search.com sends your search query to several search engines at one time and integrates the results into one list which has been sorted by relevance using Search.com's proprietary algorithm. You can customize the list of search engines included in your metasearch from the preferences.

The search engines that are used in your metasearch may allow companies to pay to have their Web sites included within the results. To view the Paid Inclusion policy for a specific search engine, please visit their Web site. Search.com does not accept payment or share revenue with any search engine partner for listings in this section.