Cardinality of the continuum

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In mathematics, the cardinality of the continuum is the cardinal number of the set of real numbers R (sometimes called the continuum). This cardinal number is often denoted by \mathfrak c,

\mathfrak c = |\mathbb R|

Contents

Georg Cantor introduced the concept of cardinality to compare the sizes of infinite sets. He famously showed that the set of real numbers is uncountably infinite; i.e. c is strictly greater than the cardinality of the natural numbers, \aleph_0 (aleph-null):

\aleph_0 < \mathfrak c

In other words, there are strictly more real numbers than there are integers. Cantor proved this statement in several different ways. See Cantor's first uncountability proof and Cantor's diagonal argument.

A variation on Cantor's diagonal argument can be used to prove Cantor's theorem which states that the cardinality of any set is strictly less than that of its power set, i.e. |A| < 2|A|. One concludes that the power set P(N) of the natural numbers N is uncountable. It is then natural to ask whether the cardinality of P(N) is equal to c. It turns out that the answer is yes. One can prove this in two steps:

  1. Define a map f : RP(Q) from the reals to the power set of the rationals by sending each real number x to the set \{q \in \mathbb{Q} | q \le x\} of all rationals less than or equal to x (with the reals viewed as Dedekind cuts, this is nothing other than the inclusion map in the set of sets of rationals). This map is injective since the rationals are dense in R. Since the rationals are countable we have that \mathfrak c \le 2^{\aleph_0}.
  2. Let {0,2}N be the set of infinite sequences with values in set {0,2}. This set clearly has cardinality 2^{\aleph_0} (the natural bijection between the set of binary sequences and P(N) is given by the indicator function). Now associate to each such sequence (ai) the unique real number in the interval [0,1] with the ternary-expansion given by the digits (ai), i.e. the i-th digit after the decimal point is ai. The image of this map is called the Cantor set. It is not hard to see that this map is injective, for by avoiding points with the digit 1 in their ternary expansion we avoid conflicts created by the fact that the ternary-expansion of a real number is not unique. We then have that 2^{\aleph_0} \le \mathfrak c.

By the Cantor–Bernstein–Schroeder theorem we conclude that

\mathfrak c = |\mathcal{P}(\mathbb{N})| = 2^{\aleph_0}.

The sequence of beth numbers is defined by setting \beth_0 = \aleph_0 and \beth_{k+1} = 2^{\beth_k}. So c is the second beth number, beth-one

\mathfrak c = \beth_1

The third beth number, \beth_2 = 2^\mathfrak c, is the cardinality of the set of all subsets of the real line.

By using the rules of cardinal arithmetic one can show that

\mathfrak c = n \mathfrak c = \aleph_0 \mathfrak c = \mathfrak c^n = n^{\aleph_0} = {\aleph_0}^{\aleph_0} = \mathfrak c^{\aleph_0}

where n is any finite cardinal ≥ 2.

The famous continuum hypothesis asserts that c is also the first aleph number \aleph_1. In other words, the continuum hypothesis states that there is no set A whose cardinality lies strictly between \aleph_0 and c

\not\exists A : \aleph_0 < |A| < \mathfrak c

However, this statement is now known to be independent of the axioms of Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory (ZFC). That is, both the hypothesis and its negation are consistent with these axioms. In fact, for every nonzero natural number n, the equality c = \aleph_n is independent of ZFC. (The case n = 1 is the continuum hypothesis.) The same is true for most other alephs, although in some cases equality can be ruled out by König's theorem on the grounds of cofinality, e.g., \mathfrak{c}\neq\aleph_\omega. In particular, \mathfrak{c} could be either \aleph_1 or \aleph_{\omega_1}, where ω1 is the first uncountable ordinal, so it could be either a successor cardinal or a limit cardinal, and either a regular cardinal or a singular cardinal.

A great many sets studied in mathematics have cardinality equal to c. Some common examples are the following:

  • Paul Halmos, Naive set theory. Princeton, NJ: D. Van Nostrand Company, 1960. Reprinted by Springer-Verlag, New York, 1974. ISBN 0-387-90092-6 (Springer-Verlag edition).
  • Jech, Thomas, 2003. Set Theory: The Third Millennium Edition, Revised and Expanded. Springer. ISBN 3-540-44085-2.
  • Kunen, Kenneth, 1980. Set Theory: An Introduction to Independence Proofs. Elsevier. ISBN 0-444-86839-9.

This article incorporates material from cardinality of the continuum on PlanetMath, which is licensed under the GFDL.

Advanced Search
Included Web Search Engines


Safe Search

close

Top Matching Results

Occasionally Search.com will highlight specialized results that are based on the context of your query. Examples of specialized results include specific links to news, images, or video.

Top Matching Results may highlight information from other Search.com pages, content from the CNET Network of sites, or third party content. The listings are based purely on relevance. Search.com does not receive payment for listings in this section but our partners that provide this data may get paid for listing these products.

Sponsored Links

This section contains paid listings which have been purchased by companies that want to have their sites appear for specific search terms and related content. These listings are administered, sorted and maintained by a third party and are not endorsed by Search.com.

Search Results

Search.com sends your search query to several search engines at one time and integrates the results into one list which has been sorted by relevance using Search.com's proprietary algorithm. You can customize the list of search engines included in your metasearch from the preferences.

The search engines that are used in your metasearch may allow companies to pay to have their Web sites included within the results. To view the Paid Inclusion policy for a specific search engine, please visit their Web site. Search.com does not accept payment or share revenue with any search engine partner for listings in this section.