Sources
Help build the largest human-edited directory on the web.
Submit a site - Become an editor
Wikipedia. Licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Are you an expert in this subject? Join the discussion and share your knowledge at Wikipedia.org.
Brown v. Mississippi
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Brown v. Mississippi, 297 U.S. 278, (1936), was a United States Supreme Court case that ruled that convictions, which are based solely upon confessions coerced by violence, violate the Due Process Clause.
Contents |
Three black defendants were convicted of murdering Raymond Stewart, whose death occurred on March 30, 1934. Torture was then used in order to extract confessions from the defendants. This was the only evidence used in the subsequent one-day trial, in which they were convicted and sentenced to death. The prosecutor in this case was John Stennis, who later became a United States senator.
In a unanimous decision, the Court reversed the convictions of the defendants, in an opinion delivered by Chief Justice Hughes. It was decided that convictions which result solely from defendants' confessions which are extracted by violence violate the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
This article related to a U.S. Supreme Court case is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.