Collaborative authorship

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Collaborative authorship is the act of co-creating and consulting within a group of people to create a project, in which the author of the project is the group itself rather than a single person.

From an academic perspective, there is anxiety about collaborative authorial endeavours. Academics are concerned with being able to discover who wrote what, and which ideas belong to whom (York 76).

In other disciplines, such as the sciences, collaborative writing is the norm. In social sciences, such as library science, collaboration has increased dramatically over the past 25 years (Bahr & Zemon 410, 412). Alice Harrison Bahr and Mickey Zemon’s study of academic journals came to the conclusion that “as evidenced in the sciences and social sciences, collaboration encourages author productivity and enhances article quality. As research becomes more quantitative, collaboration increases” (417).

In an artistic sense, as Lorraine York notes, “Critics and readers feel a persistent need to ‘de-collaborate’ these works, to parse the collective text into the separate contributions of two or more authors” (7).

Wikipedia (and, indeed, all wikis) is an example of collaborative writing. This collaborative effort is both the strength and the weakness of Wikipedia, because it enhances article quality, but at the same time it occasionally creates skepticism about the authority of the information.

Contents

Bahr, Alice Harrison and Mickey Zemon. “Collaborative Authorship in the Journal Literature: Perspectives for Academic Librarians Who Wish to Publish.” College & Research Libraries (2000) 410-419.

York, Lorraine. Rethinking Collaborative Women’s Writing. Toronto: U of Toronto P, 2002.

Ashton, Susanna M. Collaborators in Literary America, 1870-1920. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.

  • MetaCollab.net - help contribute to a free collaborative encyclopedia on collaboration.
  • [1] - Bahr & Zemon's article
  • [2] - York's book on GoogleBooks
Advanced Search
Included Web Search Engines


Safe Search

close

Top Matching Results

Occasionally Search.com will highlight specialized results that are based on the context of your query. Examples of specialized results include specific links to news, images, or video.

Top Matching Results may highlight information from other Search.com pages, content from the CNET Network of sites, or third party content. The listings are based purely on relevance. Search.com does not receive payment for listings in this section but our partners that provide this data may get paid for listing these products.

Sponsored Links

This section contains paid listings which have been purchased by companies that want to have their sites appear for specific search terms and related content. These listings are administered, sorted and maintained by a third party and are not endorsed by Search.com.

Search Results

Search.com sends your search query to several search engines at one time and integrates the results into one list which has been sorted by relevance using Search.com's proprietary algorithm. You can customize the list of search engines included in your metasearch from the preferences.

The search engines that are used in your metasearch may allow companies to pay to have their Web sites included within the results. To view the Paid Inclusion policy for a specific search engine, please visit their Web site. Search.com does not accept payment or share revenue with any search engine partner for listings in this section.