Alcoa

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

(Redirected from Aluminum Company of America)
Jump to: navigation, search
ALCOA, Inc.
Type Public (NYSE: AA)
Founded 1888 in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Headquarters Principal: Flag of the United States New York, NY
Operational: Flag of the United States Pittsburgh, PA
Key people Alain Belda (CEO and Chairman)
Industry Aluminum
Products building products
fastenings
castings
aluminum foil
automobile parts
rolled aluminum
milled aluminum
Revenue US$30.4 billion (2006) [1]
Net income US$2.248 billion (2006) [2]
Employees 129,000 (2006)
Website http://www.alcoa.com

Alcoa (NYSEAA) is the world’s third largest producer of aluminum, behind Rio Tinto and Rusal. [1] Alcoa leads the world in alumina production and capacity. From its operational headquarters in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Alcoa oversees operations in 44 countries. It is followed closely by a former subsidiary, Alcan, a Canadian-based company in Montreal, which was the third-leading producer behind Alcoa, but in terms of sales Alcan is ahead of Alcoa. Alcoa made a hostile $27 billion bid for Alcan on May 7th, 2007, aiming to reunite the two companies and form the largest aluminum producer in the world. The takeover bid was withdrawn after Alcan announced a friendly takeover by Rio Tinto on July 12, 2007.

In addition to aluminum products, Alcoa also makes and markets consumer brands including Reynolds Wrap foil and plastic wrap, Baco household wraps, and Alcoa wheels. Among Alcoa’s other businesses are closures, fastening systems, Howmet Castings, and electrical distribution systems for cars.[2] The packaging unit, including the Reynolds Metals subsidiary, is expected to be spun off to satisfy antitrust regulators, in response to the proposed Alcan takeover.

Contents

In 1886, Charles Martin Hall, a graduate of Ohio’s Oberlin College, discovered the process of smelting aluminum, almost simultaneously with Paul Héroult in France. He realized that by passing an electrical current through a bath of cryolite and aluminum oxide, the then semi-rare metal aluminum remained as a byproduct. This discovery, now called the Hall-Héroult process, is still the only process used to make aluminum worldwide.

Probably fewer than ten sites in the United States and Europe produced any aluminum at the time. In 1887, Hall made an agreement to try his process at the Electric Smelting and Aluminum Company plant in Lockport, New York but it was not used and Hall left after one year. On Thanksgiving day 1888, with the help of Alfred E. Hunt, started the Pittsburgh Reduction Company with an experimental smelting plant on Smallman Street in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. In 1891, the company went into production in New Kensington, Pennsylvania. In 1895 a third site opened at Niagara Falls. By about 1903, after a settlement with Hall's former employer, and while its patents were in force, the company was the only legal supplier of aluminum in the US.[3][4]

"The Aluminum Company of America" -- became the firm's new name in 1907. The acronym "Alcoa" was coined in 1910, given as a name to two of the locales where major corporate facilities were located (although one of these has since been changed), and in 1999 was adopted as the official corporate name.

Under President Franklin D. Roosevelt, the Justice Department charged Alcoa with illegal monopolization, and demanded that the company be dissolved. Trial began on June 1, 1938.

Four years later, the trial judge dismissed the case. The government appealed.

Two more years passed, and in 1944, the Supreme Court announced that it couldn’t assemble a quorum to hear the case so it referred the matter to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

The following year, the year the world weary of war at last had a chance at peace, was also appropriately enough the year this litigation came to its end. Learned Hand wrote the opinion for the Second Circuit.

Hand wrote that he could consider only the percentage of the market in “virgin aluminum” for which Alcoa accounted. Alcoa had argued that it was in the position of having to compete with scrap. Even if the scrap was aluminum that Alcoa had manufactured in the first instance, it no longer controlled its marketing. But no, Hand defined the relevant market narrowly in accord with the prosecution’s theory.

Alcoa said that if it was in fact deemed a monopoly, it acquired that position honestly, through outcompeting other companies through greater efficiencies. Hand applied a rule concerning practices that are illegal per se here, saying that it doesn’t matter how Alcoa became a monopoly, since its offense was simply to become one. Indeed, Hand seemed to be saying that in some circumstances inefficiency may be a requirement of the law.

Hand acknowledged the possibility that a monopoly might just happen, without anyone’s having planned for it. If it did, then there would be no wrong, no liability, and no need to remedy the result. But that acknowledgement has generally been seen as an empty one in the context of the rest of the opinion, because of course rivals in a market routinely plan to outdo one another, at the least by increasing efficiency and appealing more effectively to actual and potential customers. If one competitor succeeds through such plans to the extent of 90% of the market, that planning can be described given Hand's reasoning as the successful and illegal monopolization of the market.

This leaves the question, what is the proper remedy once a wrongful monopolization is found? Here Hand remanded the matter to the trial court, and the whole narrative comes to an unsatisfactory conclusion – more of a dissipation, really, than a conclusion. In 1947, Alcoa made the argument to the court that there were two effective new entrants into the aluminum market – Reynolds and Kaiser – as a result of demobilization after the war and the government’s divestiture of defense plants. In other words, the problem had solved itself and no judicial action would be required. On this basis, the district court judge ruled against divestiture in 1950, but the court retained jurisdiction over the case for five years, so that it could look over Alcoa’s shoulder and ensure that there was no re-monopolization.

Until 1950, Alcoa was concerned with its domestic market, while its Canadian subsidiary Aluminum Limited (Alcan) took care of the international markets. Alcoa, Reynolds, and Kaiser were soon joined in the growing market by Anaconda Aluminum Company, a subsidiary of the copper-industry giant. In 1958 Harvey Machine Tools Company began primary aluminum production, marking the end of Alcoa's monopoly over the process which had led to its domination of the American market.

Noted economist and former Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan criticized the judgment of monopoly against Alcoa (Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal; see[5]) quotes Learned Hand, the judge in U.S. v Alcoa, who remarked, "It was not inevitable that it should always anticipate increases in the demand for ingot and be prepared to supply them. Nothing compelled it to keep doubling and redoubling its capacity before others entered the field. It insists that it never excluded competitors; but we can think of no more effective exclusion than progressively to embrace each new opportunity as it opened, and to face every newcomer with new capacity already geared into a great organization, having the advantage of experience, trade connections and the elite of personnel." Greenspan believes that the characterization of Alcoa as a threat to competition is erroneous, as "ALCOA is being condemned for being too successful, too efficient, and too good a competitor. Whatever damage the antitrust laws may have done to our economy, whatever distortions of the structure of the nation's capital they may have created, these are less disastrous than the fact that the effective purpose, the hidden intent, and the actual practice of the antitrust laws in the United States have led to the condemnation of the productive and efficient members of our society because they are productive and efficient." Greenspan grants that Alcoa was a monopoly, but maintains that it was not a coercive monopoly and, hence, should not have been subject to anti-trust action.

Alcoa established an 8% stake in China’s state-run aluminum industry and has formed a strategic alliance with Aluminium Corporation of China (Chalco), China’s largest aluminum producer, at its Pingguo facility. Alcoa sold this stake on 12 September 2007. [3]

Alcoa has also acquired two facilities in Russia, at Samara and Belaya Kalitva. Alcoa recently launched an offer to purchase the remaining 18% of the Belaya Kalitva plant from minority shareholders, giving it complete ownership in the facility.

In 2004, Alcoa's specialty chemicals division was sold, taking on the name Almatis, Inc..

In 2005, under heavy criticism by local and international NGOs related to a controversial dam project exclusively dedicated to supplying electricity to this smelter, Alcoa began construction in Iceland on Alcoa Fjardaal, a state-of-the-art aluminum smelter and the company’s first greenfield smelter in more than 20 years. Alcoa also signed a memorandum of understanding with the government of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago to build a low-emissions aluminum smelter and related facilities there. However, there has been strong objection of this by the residents of the area of the proposed smelter sparking protests and marches frequently.Also, Alcoa is working with the government of Ghana on the development of the aluminum industry in that country. Furthermore, Alcoa has completed or is undergoing primary aluminum expansion projects in Brazil, Jamaica, and Pinjarra, Western Australia.

In 2006, Alcoa relocated its top executives from its headquarters in Pittsburgh to New York City. Although the company's principal office is located in New York City, the company's operational headquarters are still located at its Corporate Center in Pittsburgh. Alcoa employs approximately 2,000 people at its Corporate Center in Pittsburgh and 60 at its principal office in New York. [4]

Alcoa was named one of the top three most sustainable corporations in the world at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland.

Based on year 2000 data,[6] the University of Massachusetts' Political Economy Research Institute determined that Alcoa was is one of the top ten most toxic companies in the country, producing 9,884,267 pounds of toxic chemicals in that year. [7] Since 1987, state and federal regulators have cited Alcoa for more than forty-seven pollution violations. [8] In 2002, Alcoa paid half a million dollars in fines at an Indiana plant in order to settle lawsuits charging it evaded water pollution regulations. [9] Under the controversial grandfather provisions of the Texas Clean Air Act, Alcoa has been exempt from installing up to date pollution control devices and submitting to health-impact studies. [10].

On the other hand, In 2005, BusinessWeek magazine, in conjunction with the Climate Group, ranked Alcoa as No.5 of "The Top Green Companies." in cutting their carbon gas emissions [11] [12].

Alcoa's affiliate in Ghana, the Volta Aluminum Company, was completely closed between May 2003 and early 2006, due to problems with its electricity supply. [5] [6]

By the middle of September, over 50% of the Alcoa Fjardaál smelter construction in Iceland has been finished. The total workforce on site is 1,750 people, of which 80% are of Polish origin.[citation needed] It is expected to be on line by 2007. Alcoa and the government of Iceland have signed an agreement on instigating a thorough feasibility study for a new 250,000 tpy smelter in Bakki by Húsavík in Northern Iceland. In order to power Alcoa's new smelters in Iceland, tracts of wilderness are being flooded to provide hydroelectric energy.[citation needed] Alcoa does not own the kárahnjúkar powerplant.[citation needed]

Fjardaral, which is owned by Alcoa, created jobs in the nearby town of Reyðarfjörður for people that lost their jobs when the Icelandic government decided to lower their fishing quota.[citation needed]

On November 21 2006, Alcoa announced that it is to close its Waunarlwydd works in Swansea, with the loss of 298 jobs. Production ceased at the Swansea plant on 27 January 2007. Decommissioning works are now taking place. Although rolling operations at the plant have now ceased, a small workforce is still employed in homogenisation, where heat treatment takes place for the Kitts Green plant.

Alcoa operates bauxite mines, alumina refineries and aluminium smelters through Alcoa World Alumina and Chemicals, which is a joint venture between Alumina Limited and Alcoa. Alcoa operates two bauxite mines in Western Australia - the Huntly and Willowdale mines. Alcoa World Alumina and Chemicals owns and operates three alumina refineries in Western Australia: Kwinana, Pinjarra and Wagerup. Two aluminium smelters are also operated in the state of Victoria at Portland and Point Henry.

ALCOA was lured into Blount County, Tennessee and created a plant just outside of Maryville, TN. This plant was the biggest provider of aluminum in the South. The area needed housing for workers, so ALCOA built many houses. The area eventually turned into a city and decided to name its self after the Aluminum Co. Alcoa, Tennessee was founded 1919.[citation needed]

Alcoa owns and operates the majority of its alumina refineries through its 60% share of Alcoa World Alumina and Chemicals.

Alcoa has interests in 25 primary aluminium smelters in 8 countries.

Alcoa smelters[13][14]
Country Location Equity ownership Plant Total Nameplate capacity (kt per year) Alcoa's Capacity (kt per year)
Australia Point Henry 100% 185 185
Australia Portland 55% 353 194
Brazil Poços de Caldas 100% 96
Brazil São Luís (Alumar) 60% 438 263
Canada Baie Comeau 100% 438 438
Canada Bécancour 75% 409 307
Canada Deschambault 100% 254 254
Italy Fusina 100% 44 44
Italy Portovesme 100% 150 150
Spain Avilés 100% 90 90
Spain La Coruña 100% 84 84
Spain San Ciprián 100% 225 225
United States Evansville, IN (Warrick) 100% 309 309
United States Frederick, MD (Eastalco) 100% 195 195
United States Badin, NC 100% 60 60
United States Massena, NY 100% 130 130
United States St. Lawrence, NY 100% 125 125
United States Mount Holly, SC 50% 229 115
United States Alcoa Operations, TN 100% 215 215
United States Rockdale, TX 100% 267 267
United States Ferndale, WA (Intalco) 100% 279 279
United States Wenatchee, WA 100% 184 184
Ghana Tema 10% 200 20
Norway Lista 50% 94 47
Norway Mosjøen 50% 188 94

  1. ^ Gimme Smelter. The Economist (2007-07-19). Retrieved on 2007-10-15.
  2. ^ Alcoa About Alcoa. Alcoa. Retrieved on 2007-10-15.
  3. ^ Hachez-Leroy, Florence (2006). "Aluminium industry: a Heritage for Europe" (PDF). Proceedings, TICCIH Congress. Retrieved on 2007-11-03.
  4. ^ Rosenbaum, David Ira (1998). Market Dominance: How Firms Gain, Hold, or Lose It and the Impact on Economic Performance. Praeger Publishers via Greenwood Publishing Group, 56 briefly visible in Google Books limited view. ISBN 0-2759-5604-0. Retrieved on 2007-11-03. 
  5. ^ Antitrust by Alan Greenspan
  6. ^ [http://www.peri.umass.edu/Technical-Notes.264.0.html Political Economy Research Institute Toxic 100 Corporate Toxics Information Project Technical Notes retrieved 9 Nov 2007
  7. ^ Toxic 100 Detailed Company Report.
  8. ^ http://www.savingiceland.org/node/405?PHPSESSID=ec2a7e79
  9. ^ http://www.uswaternews.com/archives/arcrights/2alcto2.html
  10. ^ http://www.tpj.org/docs/2000/01/reports/toxic/grandfather.html
  11. ^ Unknown Author (December 6, 2005). "DuPont Tops BusinessWeek Ranking of Green Companies". GreenBiz News. 
  12. ^ Green Leaders Show The Way Business Week
  13. ^ Alcoa smelting capacity. Retrieved on 2007-08-20.
  14. ^ Alcoa: Worldwide: Markets: Aluminum Ingot Products: Global Capacity. Retrieved on 2007-08-28.

Advanced Search
Included Web Search Engines


Safe Search

close

Top Matching Results

Occasionally Search.com will highlight specialized results that are based on the context of your query. Examples of specialized results include specific links to news, images, or video.

Top Matching Results may highlight information from other Search.com pages, content from the CNET Network of sites, or third party content. The listings are based purely on relevance. Search.com does not receive payment for listings in this section but our partners that provide this data may get paid for listing these products.

Sponsored Links

This section contains paid listings which have been purchased by companies that want to have their sites appear for specific search terms and related content. These listings are administered, sorted and maintained by a third party and are not endorsed by Search.com.

Search Results

Search.com sends your search query to several search engines at one time and integrates the results into one list which has been sorted by relevance using Search.com's proprietary algorithm. You can customize the list of search engines included in your metasearch from the preferences.

The search engines that are used in your metasearch may allow companies to pay to have their Web sites included within the results. To view the Paid Inclusion policy for a specific search engine, please visit their Web site. Search.com does not accept payment or share revenue with any search engine partner for listings in this section.